The Lily and the Rose is a symbol attributed to the Rosicrucians. It represents the integration of six and five. This seemed an appropriate symbol for the idea of reconciling the apparently contradictory models within Chinese medicine. Six is a number important in Yin-Yang doctrine (as are all even numbers) and five represents the five elements. To the left is the Five Elements and to the right the Ba Gua (Eight Trigrams). The Tai Ji (Yin-Yang diagram) is appropriately in the centre of both. The motto below the Lily and Rose is an alchemical saying: "Igne Natura Renovatur Integra", By Fire is Nature Renewed Whole' or 'The Whole of Nature is renewed by Fire'.
Those who speak know nothing
This is the same dilemma that
we face in all the practical applications of Chinese natural science,
including Chinese medicine. The Chinese have always been very pragmatic
and seemed to have no problem with the transition from the philosophical
to the practical. Recognizing that these two are ultimately different.
As the Tao Te Ching says:
Ever desireless, one can
see the mystery.
There is a tendency to a dichotomy within Chinese thought; at worst this seems to become 'lip service' to the principles and philosophy, and a gulf between the philosophical and practical. I suggest that the philosophical and the practical can be brought closer together. One way of understanding the gulf between so called Classical Chinese Medicine and Traditional Chinese Medicine is to see CCM as intending to follow more strongly the idealism of the Classics, and modern TCM as more practical and pragmatic.
I use the word 'intending' because we live in a dualistic world we cannot completely attain the ideal; wholistic is an aim, but we necessarily have to exist in the dualistic world. Our language is based in the dualism. The Heart Sutra of Buddhism has an expression. "Going on beyond, always becoming Buddha". The idea here is that CCM is a journey that we are on and ideal we are aiming for but that we cannot arrive at in the mundane world.
Taoism has been described as 'dualistic monism', it contains a fundamental holistic view of the universe and an understanding of the universe that is based on the dualistic principles of Yin and Yang. The juxtaposition of these two viewpoint has been symbolized in esoteric thought as 'squaring the circle'; the square representing the 'four square' Earth, the circle representing the unitary Heaven. Similarly in Chinese numerology the odd numbers are Heavenly and the even numbers Earthly. Chinese science uses many models that are developments of the yin/yang principles, and because some of these are based upon odd numbers and some even, they can not be made totally congruent. In the West we are used to assuming that we have to choose between two theories, or systems or arrive at a synthesis; just as Western scientists are at present trying to reconcile relativity and quantum theories into a 'grand unified theory'. The Chinese system allows that differing viewpoints can not be completely reconciled, and yet both can be true. In other words to make a 'square peg fit a round hole' would only be achieved by some damage to one or other. The Chinese system of knowledge has been described as syncretic, from this viewpoint, it may not be possible to reach a 'grand unified theory. In Chinese medicine a model based upon Two (Yin & Yang), and Five (Elements/Phases) are both seen as correct, and yet cannot be entirely congruent. From the number two the Earthly world's complexity extends in symmetrical way: Four Emblems (Seasons), Six (paired) Channels, Eight Trigrams.
About the Author
I originally trained to practice Five Element acupuncture with J.R. Worsley. I studied widely, especially TCM texts, and more recently as Clinical Director of the Jung Tao School of Classical Chinese Medicine I have been exposed to other non-TCM teachings. I have not found anything yet that, however different it may appear at first sight, can not be reconciled. I would like to mention that I am not a sinologist, my study of Chinese characters is mainly with the works of Claude Larre on one side of me, and various resources on Chinese characters and etymology on the other. I see this exploration and integration of the traditions of acupuncture as a 'work in progress', and I would especially recommend for reading ' Five Element Constitutional Acupuncture', the work of John & Angela Hicks and Peter Mole founders of the College of Integrated Chinese Medicine in Reading UK.
The following are a series
of discussions about the various viewpoints found within Chinese Medicine.
The numerology and cosmology contained therein is an overview of a more
comprehensive work that I am engaged in at present. This is my own understanding
of these subjects and how the apparent contradictions may be reconciled
- as such I could have titled this page "towards an integrated Chinese
Preface: an introduction to Integrated Chinese Medicine: A discussion of Classical Acupuncture, especially the teachings of J.R.Worsley.
East/West. The worldview of the east and west have long been thought to be different. Richard Nisbett in The Geography of Thought has identified these differences. These are applicable to understanding Chinese medcine and especially Classical Chinese medicine.
Numerology and Traditional Oriental Medicine: a brief synopsis of the principles of numerology in particular reference to Chinese Medicine. Understanding the underlying cosmology and numerology can help resolve some of the apparent contradictions within Chinese medicine and reveal its cohesiveness. And even lead us to understand why the differing models and viewpoints within Chinese Medicine can all be true (as with the proverbial elephant and the blind men).
Chinese Characters applicable to Chinese Medicine. One thing that distinguished Classical Acupuncture and systematized Chinese Medicine is the interpretation of Chinese characters as having multi-layered and metaphorical meaning in the former and more technical and circumscribed meaning in the latter.
J.R.Worsley and the Classics: A look at the origin of many non-TCM principles and practices, especially those of J.R.Worsley, in the classic texts of the Nei Jing and Nan Jing.
Diverging traditions in Chinese medicine: An examination of the history of Oriental medicine especially the divergence between China and Japan that may account for the main differences in modern approaches.
Diverging traditions in pulse examination: An examination of the development of the two main traditions of pulse examination (especially in relation to the pulse positions) that distinguish modern TCM and Five Phases. One model is derived from the Classic Nan Jing, the other was developed later. These differences in some ways represent the different emphasis of the two models.
Mind and Spirit in Classical Chinese Medicine: An examination of the mind and spirit in modern TCM and Classical Chinese Medicine.
Discussion on the Emotions as described in Chinese Medicine: Different traditions have differing descriptions of the main emotions, and even TCM texts vary in their understanding of these. In particular J. R. Worsley and others have described the specific emotion of Earth as sympathy. This article looks at the classic texts of the Nei Jing and Nan Jing and attempts to clarify the understanding of this.
Chinese Medicine and Systems Theory: Chinese medicine's understanding of the body-mind is a wholistic inter-relational model. This explains some of the differences between the Chinese concepts and modern anatomy.
Twelve Officials and Five Zang & Six Fu: An examination of the different traditions of acupuncture in relation to the main functional units of the body-mind. In Five Phases greater emphasis is based upon the broader non-physiological aspects of the 'officials' and in modern TCM the more pragmatic functionality is emphasized. The TCM model also divided internal organs into 'viscera' and 'bowels', with the latter having a more secondary or mundane role than the former. In Five Phase understanding the so called 'bowel' actually represents a broader range of 'yang' aspects of the Phasic attributes.
Orbs and Organs: Although the functional components of the body as described in Chinese medicine are transliterated into the name of an organ as understood in Western medicine, these are by no means equivalent. For this reason, Manfred Porkert has coined the term 'orb' to refer to the Chinese concept. My main criticism of (my own) Five Element training would be that in the absence of Zang-Fu theory the tendency was to equate the Western understanding of the organ to the 'orbs' assigned to the phases, rather than the Eastern. I am told that this important distinction is not necessarily taught or understood even within TCM training.
What's in a Name? The functional entitiy known as the Pericardium in modern TCM has the distinction of being referred to by various names in the classic texts: Xin Bao Luo, Xin Zhu, Dan Zhong. In European texts including the teachings of J. R. Worsley this was referred to a Circulation/Sex. Examining the implications of these various names Pericardium would appear to be a poor translation, and also represents a simplification and limiting of the understanding of this function.
Aggressive Energy and Evil Heat : TCM writers often comment on the apparent complexity of the average patient in a Western acupuncture practice. One of the most common complexities is the presence of heat signs and symptoms in many patients. Two theories serve to explain this, Law of Similar Transformation and Yin Fire Theory. The close connection of these theories to J.R.Worsley's concept of Aggressive Energy is very clear.
Element within Element: Emphasized within Constitutional Five Element diagnosis. This article is the author's suggestion of a way that this can be understood at least intelectually as having a shared underlying idea with syndromic diagnosis.
The Medical Masters of the Jin-Yuan Important changes took place in the Jin-Yuan dynasty. Including: The Attacking School, The Supporting the Yin school, Yin Fire theory, Law of Similar Transformation, Supporting the Earth School. Some of these are central to understanding the diverging approaches within traditional Chinese medicine. Some are important developments especially in understanding fire and heat pathology.
The Direct and Indirect methods of Needling The basic principles of needling appear to be defined differently in the Su Wen to modern ones. And indeed a change in definition of these terms can be seen in chapters of the Su Wen that are known to have been added at a later date than the main material. The difference between the minimalist approach to needling found in Japanese and especially Five Element practice and more forceful mainstream practice can be understood by the classical principles.
Thes following are miscellaneous articles:
Acupuncture and the 50 minute hour. This is a response to an article written by Bob Flaws in Acupucnture Today in which he criticised the common practice of treating patients once a week. This practice is common in Five Element approach and is found to make a great deal of sense in western clinical practice.
This Channel Discusssion article by John McDonald is good in parts and I agree with several points and disagree with others. I agree that Westerners may have emphasized too strongly the separation of the channel system and the blood vessels. I also agree that the generic term jing-luo may have led to confusions over the idea of luo channels specifically and the idea of the luo as generic of all the collaterals - (channels and vessels). However, the discussion on the idea of energic transfers appears to be missing the Nan Jing. There are several passages in the Nan Jing that support the idea of balancing the full and empty. Question 76 and several others that follow. Balance is not exactly the same as 'transfer' but the implication is very clearly an idea of Shi and Xu that is not the same as the modern received teachings.
There is a website devoted to Classical Chinese Medicine
I particularly recomend the works of Heiner Fruehauf.
Chinese Character links:
Zhong Wen is a particularly good resource. Traditionally characters have been classified under radicals. This author has developed family trees of characters based upon their various components. It is mainly common characters, and so is not comprehensive.
The author has assembled a very comprehensive site that enables one to view up to date etymology and very comprehensive of older and less common characters.
Note the etymologies in the above two resources often differ from older explanations and from each other. Examination of the older examples in the latter site enables us to compare the merits of the various ideas.
This resource of characters included in the modern unicode based computer fonts. Very comprehensive, but often there are no definitions given for many uncommon characters.
©Andrew Prescott 2006
Do give me your feedback and comments.
Contact: B.Ac.(UK), Dipl.Ac(NCCAOM), L.Ac.(NC)